WagerX evidence archive / operating history

Longest-Running Crypto Casinos.
History, then evidence.

Five established crypto-casino brands, listed because their operating history can be documented. That history is useful context — it is not a safety certificate, a solvency claim, or a substitute for today’s evidence.

Evidence refreshed 5 brands in this archive 5 re-audited this week
Read this first: “Long-running” describes documented presence over time. It does not mean WagerX endorses a brand, predicts a payout, or considers an operator safe. Read the current audit evidence and the linked review before making any decision.
The records

History, then evidence.

Each record keeps two questions apart: what can be documented about the operator’s past, and what WagerX can verify in the latest audit.

RECORD 01 / 05

BetUS

Current audit

Documented history: The BetUS brand dates to 1994, before online casino play and crypto deposits became part of its offer. The date is brand history, not proof of present-day licensing or legality in any jurisdiction.

Audit date
Withdrawal0.8 ETH
Trust score9.0
Randomness / RTPNo issues detected
KYCNone triggered (soft KYC above $3k)
Support1 min
WagerX note: BetUS's best live testing note so far — a very smooth experience: 0.5 ETH in, 0.8 ETH back after a winning session, support answering in 1 minute. We did, however, use the same wallet as last time. Overall BetUS is a solid casino and we don't expect any major issues. Re-audited August 18, 2026.
RECORD 02 / 05

7Bit

Current audit

Documented history: 7Bit states that it was founded in 2014; the domain was also created in October 2014. Operator and licence details can change independently of the brand's age.

Audit date
Withdrawal0.7 ETH (15 min)
Trust score8.0
Randomness / RTPNo issues detected
KYCNone
Support8 min
WagerX note: Released-from-observation status holds. This casino has operated for more than 10 years and is well established, but we are not happy with the 15-minute withdrawal time. In 2026, we expect withdrawals to be faster.
RECORD 03 / 05

Fortune Jack

Current audit

Documented history: The FortuneJack brand reports operating since 2014. Ownership and licensing have changed over that history, so WagerX treats the year as brand continuity—not continuous approval by one regulator.

Audit date
Withdrawal0.009 BTC (12 min)
Trust score6.5
Randomness / RTPNo issues detected
KYCNone
Support4 min
WagerX note: Fortune Jack is back to regular listings after a successful live test — our second clean pass in a row. Great run this session: 0.005 BTC in, 0.009 BTC back in the wallet in about 12 minutes, support answering in 4 minutes, and no KYC triggered on a Norwegian VPN. Worth noting that Fortune Jack still carries a lot of complaints on Bitcointalk, which keeps the score conservative. Re-audited August 18, 2026.
RECORD 04 / 05

bspin

Current audit

Documented history: Public company and industry profiles place bspin's launch in 2018. That operating span is useful context, but current withdrawal, KYC and support evidence carries more weight.

Audit date
Withdrawal0.008 BTC (Instant)
Trust score8.5
Randomness / RTPNo issues detected
KYCNone
Support2 min
WagerX note: Once again, a good run on bspin — this casino deserves more attention. We have worked with bspin since 2020 and have literally never had an issue. It might not have all the extras that casinos like Rollbit and BC.Game offer, but it's a quality casino that works, and that is just as important. The 0.008 BTC withdrawal cleared instantly, support held at 2 minutes, no KYC. Re-audited August 13.
RECORD 05 / 05

Mirax

Current audit

Documented history: Mirax is the youngest brand in this established cohort, launched in 2022. It is separated from genuinely new arrivals, but its shorter history should not be compared with a 1990s operator as if the evidence were equal.

Audit date
Withdrawal0.17 ETH (Instant)
Trust score8.0
Randomness / RTPNo issues detected
KYCNone
Support7 min
WagerX note: Released-from-observation status holds. Mirax operator (shared platform with 7Bit) replied in 6 minutes on the July 23 test ticket. Re-audited end-to-end: 0.17 ETH withdrawal cleared without KYC, RTB clean, VPN Norway accepted. Library still the strongest in the segment (3,800+ titles). Trust score holds at 8.0 after restoration. Re-audited July 23 — clean run, no surprises.
Editorial separation

Age is a timeline.
Safety is a live question.

We use operating history to establish provenance: a brand has been visible, reachable, and documented across a period of time. We do not convert that fact into a rating.

Current WagerX audits examine observable evidence such as deposits, withdrawals, game or randomness checks, KYC triggers, and support response. Conditions can change after any audit. Follow the evidence links, check the date, and read restrictions before you act.

Archive questions

What this page can — and cannot — tell you

Why list long-running casinos at all?

Operating history helps readers distinguish an established public brand from a newly launched site. It is a research signal about continuity, not proof of fair games, liquidity, licensing, or reliable withdrawals.

Does WagerX recommend these five brands?

No. Inclusion in this historical archive is not an endorsement. A recommendation, where available, must come from the latest WagerX audit evidence and the specific terms that apply to your location and account.

How current is the evidence?

The page shows the latest available audit date for each record and the archive refresh date above. A dated audit describes conditions observed at that time. Re-check the linked review and operator terms before depositing.

What should I read next?

Start with the forensic review link for the brand you are researching, then inspect the current audit fields, withdrawal observations, restrictions, KYC notes, and sourcing links. If no audit is published, treat that absence as uncertainty.

WagerX may receive affiliate compensation when a reader visits an operator through a marked link. Compensation does not buy inclusion, ranking, or a positive audit outcome. Sources are linked per record so you can inspect the underlying trail.