BetUS
Documented history: The BetUS brand dates to 1994, before online casino play and crypto deposits became part of its offer. The date is brand history, not proof of present-day licensing or legality in any jurisdiction.
Five established crypto-casino brands, listed because their operating history can be documented. That history is useful context — it is not a safety certificate, a solvency claim, or a substitute for today’s evidence.
Each record keeps two questions apart: what can be documented about the operator’s past, and what WagerX can verify in the latest audit.
Documented history: The BetUS brand dates to 1994, before online casino play and crypto deposits became part of its offer. The date is brand history, not proof of present-day licensing or legality in any jurisdiction.
Documented history: 7Bit states that it was founded in 2014; the domain was also created in October 2014. Operator and licence details can change independently of the brand's age.
Documented history: The FortuneJack brand reports operating since 2014. Ownership and licensing have changed over that history, so WagerX treats the year as brand continuity—not continuous approval by one regulator.
Documented history: Public company and industry profiles place bspin's launch in 2018. That operating span is useful context, but current withdrawal, KYC and support evidence carries more weight.
Documented history: Mirax is the youngest brand in this established cohort, launched in 2022. It is separated from genuinely new arrivals, but its shorter history should not be compared with a 1990s operator as if the evidence were equal.
We use operating history to establish provenance: a brand has been visible, reachable, and documented across a period of time. We do not convert that fact into a rating.
Current WagerX audits examine observable evidence such as deposits, withdrawals, game or randomness checks, KYC triggers, and support response. Conditions can change after any audit. Follow the evidence links, check the date, and read restrictions before you act.
Operating history helps readers distinguish an established public brand from a newly launched site. It is a research signal about continuity, not proof of fair games, liquidity, licensing, or reliable withdrawals.
No. Inclusion in this historical archive is not an endorsement. A recommendation, where available, must come from the latest WagerX audit evidence and the specific terms that apply to your location and account.
The page shows the latest available audit date for each record and the archive refresh date above. A dated audit describes conditions observed at that time. Re-check the linked review and operator terms before depositing.
Start with the forensic review link for the brand you are researching, then inspect the current audit fields, withdrawal observations, restrictions, KYC notes, and sourcing links. If no audit is published, treat that absence as uncertainty.
WagerX may receive affiliate compensation when a reader visits an operator through a marked link. Compensation does not buy inclusion, ranking, or a positive audit outcome. Sources are linked per record so you can inspect the underlying trail.