CASINO COMPARISON
Cloudbet vs Chancer
Side-by-side comparison based on real WagerX forensic audits, live withdrawal tests, and verified data.
See the full picture in our Casino Standings — how both rank by country and worldwide.
WagerX Quick Take — Cloudbet clearly outranks Chancer by 8.6 points in our latest audit. Privacy split: Chancer skips KYC entirely while Cloudbet requires verification. Cloudbet brings 13+ years of additional operating history.
Trust score
Winner: Cloudbet
KYC privacy
Winner: Chancer
Withdrawal speed
Tie
Heritage
Winner: Cloudbet
Game variety
Winner: Cloudbet
Crypto support
Winner: Cloudbet
Best For
Best for privacy
Chancer
Chancer runs no mandatory KYC. Cloudbet requires verification (Yes during the October 6, 2026 session; requirements may vary.).
Best for bonus hunters
Chancer
Chancer layers 2 active bonus types — more ways to extract value than Cloudbet's 1.
Best for track record
Cloudbet
Cloudbet has been operating since 2013 (13 years), versus Chancer's -7973-year history.
Best overall (WagerX score)
Cloudbet
Cloudbet scored 8.6/10 in our latest forensic audit, edging Chancer's 0.0/10.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Cloudbet | Chancer |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 8.6 | 0.0 |
| KYC Policy | Yes during the October 6, 2026 session; requirements may vary. | Verification may be requested; KYC outcome not reported in this session |
| Withdrawal Speed | Not recorded in the October 6, 2026 test | Not yet tested — live testing in progress |
| Min Deposit | Crypto-equivalent low minimums | Not independently verified; our reported deposit was 2 SOL |
| Established | 2013 | Not independently verified |
| License | Curacao | Anjouan — verified by WagerX |
| Accepted Cryptos | BitcoinEthereumLitecoinBitcoin CashUSDTUSDCDogecoinTronRippleCardanoPolkadotSolana |
Solana (2 SOL deposit reported) |
| Games | SportsbookEsportsLive CasinoSlotsRouletteBlackjackBaccaratFinancial Betting |
Casino games (gameplay reported; individual titles not supplied) |
| Bonus & Rewards | Welcome bonus on first crypto deposit with rollover requirements. Loyalty program rewards consistent volume across sportsbook and casino. Promotional offers on major sporting events. Bonus T&Cs warrant careful review before claiming due to rollover scaling. | Cashback, rakeback and Refer-a-Friend features reported in the review. Eligibility, rates and current terms should be checked with Chancer; WagerX has not tested reward payouts. |
Pros & Cons
Cloudbet — Pros
- Recorded 5.3 ETH withdrawal on October 6, 2026; processing time not recorded
- Operating since 2013 — among the longest-tenured crypto sportsbooks
- Reputation in sharp-betting communities for not aggressively limiting winning bettors
- High deposit and bet limits suitable for serious sports bettors
- Esports and financial markets betting alongside traditional sportsbook
- Multi-currency: BTC, ETH, USDT, BCH, LTC, DOGE plus dozens of altcoins
Chancer — Pros
- 2 SOL deposited and used for gameplay in our reported session
- Support answered in less than one minute during the test
- Cashback, rakeback and Refer-a-Friend features
- Norway VPN connectivity worked in the reported session — not proof of permission
Cloudbet — Cons
- Casino game library narrower than casino-first competitors
- Bonus rollover requirements warrant careful review before claiming
- Less crypto-native UX than newer competitors built for the originals era
- This session did not establish withdrawal speed or RTB results.
Chancer — Cons
- Withdrawal not yet tested; live testing remains in progress
- No trust score assigned while the payout test is outstanding
- Reward rates, wagering rules and reward payouts not yet tested
What's Unique to Each
Only on Cloudbet
Cryptos
BitcoinBitcoin CashCardanoDogecoinEthereumLitecoinPolkadotRipple
Game categories
BaccaratBlackjackEsportsFinancial BettingLive CasinoRoulette
Shared by Both
Only on Chancer
Cryptos
Solana (2 SOL deposit reported)
Game categories
Casino games (gameplay reported; individual titles not supplied)
Forensic Audit Facts
Cloudbet
- Trust score
- 8.6/10
- Withdrawal time
- Not recorded in the October 6, 2026 test
- KYC trigger
- Yes during the October 6, 2026 session; requirements may vary.
- VPN allowed
- Tolerated (geo-block bypass at own risk)
- Bonus types
- Welcome / Deposit Match
- Wagering
- See casino terms
- RTP range
- 96–98% (provider-dependent)
- Game providers
- Sportsbook, Esports, Live Casino, Slots, Roulette, Blackjack, Baccarat, Financial Betting
- Deposit methods
- Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, USDT, USDC, Dogecoin, Tron, Ripple, Cardano, Polkadot, Solana
- Last tested
- 2026-05-17
Test log: October 6, 2026: The WagerX team deposited 3.9 ETH and withdrew 5.3 ETH at Cloudbet. KYC was required during this session. Support: 24 minutes (KYC-related). No VPN was used; VPN compatibility was not tested. Withdrawal processing time was not recorded. RTB was not reported for t
Chancer
- Trust score
- 0.0/10
- Withdrawal time
- Not yet tested — live testing in progress
- KYC trigger
- Verification may be requested; KYC outcome not reported in this session
- VPN allowed
- Tolerated (geo-block bypass at own risk)
- Bonus types
- Rakeback, Cashback
- Wagering
- See casino terms
- RTP range
- 96–98% (provider-dependent)
- Game providers
- Casino games (gameplay reported; individual titles not supplied)
- Deposit methods
- Solana (2 SOL deposit reported)
- Last tested
- 2026-05-17
Test log: Reported October 26, 2026 (session date not supplied): 2 SOL deposit; funds used for gameplay; support under 1 minute; Norway VPN connectivity reported. Live testing in progress — withdrawal not yet tested. KYC and RTB results not reported. No trust score assigned. Anjouan licenc
WagerX Verdict
Cloudbet edges ahead with a WagerX trust score of 8.6/10 compared to Chancer's 0.0/10. Both platforms have been live-tested with real crypto deposits and withdrawals by the WagerX audit team. Cloudbet (est. 2013) and Chancer (est. Not independently verified) each serve different player profiles — review the full comparison above to decide which fits your needs.