CASINO COMPARISON
Roobet vs Chancer
Side-by-side comparison based on real WagerX forensic audits, live withdrawal tests, and verified data.
See the full picture in our Casino Standings — how both rank by country and worldwide.
WagerX Quick Take — Roobet clearly outranks Chancer by 9.8 points in our latest audit. Roobet brings 7+ years of additional operating history.
Trust score
Winner: Roobet
KYC privacy
Tie
Withdrawal speed
Tie
Heritage
Winner: Roobet
Game variety
Winner: Roobet
Crypto support
Winner: Roobet
Best For
Best for bonus hunters
Chancer
Chancer layers 2 active bonus types — more ways to extract value than Roobet's 1.
Best for track record
Roobet
Roobet has been operating since 2019 (7 years), versus Chancer's -7973-year history.
Best overall (WagerX score)
Roobet
Roobet scored 9.85/10 in our latest forensic audit, edging Chancer's 0.0/10.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Roobet | Chancer |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 9.85 | 0.0 |
| KYC Policy | None detected during the October 6, 2026 session; requirements may vary. | Verification may be requested; KYC outcome not reported in this session |
| Withdrawal Speed | Not recorded in the October 6, 2026 test | Not yet tested — live testing in progress |
| Min Deposit | 0.0001 BTC | Not independently verified; our reported deposit was 2 SOL |
| Established | 2019 | Not independently verified |
| License | Curacao | Anjouan — verified by WagerX |
| Accepted Cryptos | BitcoinEthereumLitecoinUSDTUSDC |
Solana (2 SOL deposit reported) |
| Games | SlotsTable GamesCrashDiceRouletteBlackjackSports BettingLive CasinoPlinko |
Casino games (gameplay reported; individual titles not supplied) |
| Bonus & Rewards | Deposit bonus offers with standard wagering requirements. Rakeback program for regular players. King of Roobet promotional competitions with significant prize pools. | Cashback, rakeback and Refer-a-Friend features reported in the review. Eligibility, rates and current terms should be checked with Chancer; WagerX has not tested reward payouts. |
Pros & Cons
Roobet — Pros
- Recorded 0.9 ETH withdrawal on October 6, 2026; processing time not recorded
- Large active player base ensures high liquidity and community engagement
- Comprehensive game selection from top-tier providers
- Integrated sportsbook alongside casino offerings
- Industry-standard compliance and operational stability
- Polished interface with consistent performance under load
Chancer — Pros
- 2 SOL deposited and used for gameplay in our reported session
- Support answered in less than one minute during the test
- Cashback, rakeback and Refer-a-Friend features
- Norway VPN connectivity worked in the reported session — not proof of permission
Roobet — Cons
- Geo-restrictions apply to several major markets
- This session did not establish withdrawal speed or RTB results.
Chancer — Cons
- Withdrawal not yet tested; live testing remains in progress
- No trust score assigned while the payout test is outstanding
- Reward rates, wagering rules and reward payouts not yet tested
What's Unique to Each
Only on Roobet
Cryptos
BitcoinEthereumLitecoinUSDCUSDT
Game categories
BlackjackCrashDiceLive CasinoPlinkoRoulette
Shared by Both
Only on Chancer
Cryptos
Solana (2 SOL deposit reported)
Game categories
Casino games (gameplay reported; individual titles not supplied)
Forensic Audit Facts
Roobet
- Trust score
- 9.85/10
- Withdrawal time
- Not recorded in the October 6, 2026 test
- KYC trigger
- None detected during the October 6, 2026 session; requirements may vary.
- VPN allowed
- Tolerated (geo-block bypass at own risk)
- Bonus types
- Rakeback
- Wagering
- See casino terms
- RTP range
- 96–98% (provider-dependent)
- Game providers
- Slots, Table Games, Crash, Dice, Roulette, Blackjack, Sports Betting, Live Casino, Plinko
- Deposit methods
- Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, USDT, USDC
- Last tested
- 2026-05-17
Test log: October 6, 2026: The WagerX team deposited 1 ETH and withdrew 0.9 ETH at Roobet. No KYC was triggered during this session. Support: 72 seconds. No VPN was used; VPN compatibility was not tested. Withdrawal processing time was not recorded. RTB was not reported for this session. S
Chancer
- Trust score
- 0.0/10
- Withdrawal time
- Not yet tested — live testing in progress
- KYC trigger
- Verification may be requested; KYC outcome not reported in this session
- VPN allowed
- Tolerated (geo-block bypass at own risk)
- Bonus types
- Rakeback, Cashback
- Wagering
- See casino terms
- RTP range
- 96–98% (provider-dependent)
- Game providers
- Casino games (gameplay reported; individual titles not supplied)
- Deposit methods
- Solana (2 SOL deposit reported)
- Last tested
- 2026-05-17
Test log: Reported October 26, 2026 (session date not supplied): 2 SOL deposit; funds used for gameplay; support under 1 minute; Norway VPN connectivity reported. Live testing in progress — withdrawal not yet tested. KYC and RTB results not reported. No trust score assigned. Anjouan licenc
WagerX Verdict
Roobet edges ahead with a WagerX trust score of 9.85/10 compared to Chancer's 0.0/10. Roobet operates without mandatory KYC, which is a major draw for privacy-focused players. Both platforms have been live-tested with real crypto deposits and withdrawals by the WagerX audit team. Roobet (est. 2019) and Chancer (est. Not independently verified) each serve different player profiles — review the full comparison above to decide which fits your needs.